Really Informational Post : Mortgage Bankers vs. Mortgage Brokers

One of the blogs I frequently visit is BlownMortgage which has been around for quite a while. There was quite an interesting post on it a few days back. Even though the original post from the archives is from 2007, yet I thought I’ll link it over here as it’s quite a well intended piece.

From his post:

Here are some common misconceptions about brokers, and a humble rebuttal.

  • Brokers don’t have to be licensed
  • Brokers have no decision making power
  • Brokers are financially unstable
  • Brokers are a rip-off

Here are some common misconceptions about mortgage bankers; again with a rebuttal:

  • Bankers charge more on loans – you just don’t know it
  • Bankers are limited to only one of two programs
  • Bankers have better rates

The best part of this post was this simple analysis-list where he jotted down the pros and cons of working with a broker and a banker.

Some pros and cons of working with a broker

Pros

  • Low overhead can lead to lower rates
  • Wide range of products from diverse lending sources
  • Can source many different financing options
  • Must disclose all compensation associated with loan

Cons

  • Necessary middleman
  • Sometimes limited decision making ability
  • Can be ephemeral, lower barrier to entry for business owners

Some pros and cons of working with a mortgage banker

Pros

  • On-site decision making ability, more control over the process
  • Better rates for larger banks (volume discounting)

Cons

  • Don’t disclose yield spread premium profit
  • May charge additional fees to support overhead (underwriting, etc.)
  • May not have true decision making ability

I just wish that he could have given more of an emphasis on the ethics involved as opposed to the “deal” for the borrower. Nevertheless, a really ‘informational’ post and a must read.

Share this post with others:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • blogmarks
  • Technorati

Leave a Reply